Machinery used in beryllium plant. Machinery used in beryllium plant.
Beryllium Network for information on beryllium and chronic beryllium disease.
News on topics related to beryllium including chronic beryllium disease and legislation pertaining to beryllium. Machinery used in beryllium plant.
Index of news articles on beryllium and beryllium-related topics.
Home, Beryllium Network
Beryllium Defined--how it is used in many industries.
Exposure risk of worker in beryllium-related industries.
Medical issues concerning chronic beryllium disease and other diseases caused by exposure to beryllium.
News on beryllium, chronic beryllium disease and legislation pertaining to beryllium.
Tools and resources regarding support groups and medical resources for those who have been exposed to beryllium or who are family members of beryllium workers.
About Brayton Purcell, attorneys involved in litigation on behalf of beryllium workers and their families.
Site map of Beryllium Network.
 
  Government to Compensate Injured Beryllium Workers—Is It Enough?

With the signing of H.R. 5408 into law this past October‚ the question that anyone who has worked with or around beryllium should ask is whether the payment of $150,000 is adequate compensation for beryllium related injuries.

More on Government Compensation Act:

The Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (H.R. 5408) establishes a program to compensate covered employees who suffer from beryllium disease‚ chronic silicosis‚ or cancer caused by radiation with a lump sum payment of $150,000 for disability and future associated medical expenses. Covered employees are those individuals who were employed by the Department of Energy (DOE)‚ its contractors and subcontractors‚ companies that provided beryllium to DOE‚ and atomic weapons employers. If the worker is deceased‚ the lump sum will be provided to survivors. This compensation program will become effective unless alternative legislation is enacted prior to July 31‚ 2001. The Act also provides that the DOE must assist workers with state workers’ compensation claims.

The statute calls for the President to submit to Congress a proposal for legislation to implement the compensation program by March 15‚ 2001. He must make specific recommendations that include the types of compensation and benefits to be provided‚ and any adjustment or modifications necessary to administer the compensation program. He also must decide whether to expand the compensation program to include other illnesses associated with toxic exposure and whether to expand the class of individuals who are considered special members of the group exposed to beryllium‚ which presently includes workers at Paducah‚ Kentucky‚ Portsmouth‚ Ohio or Oak Ridge‚ Tennessee facilities.

Although no claims for benefits are being accepted at this time‚ pending the administration’s finalizing of the plan‚ the Act calls for payments from the $250,000,000 Occupational Illness Compensation Fund to begin not later than fiscal year 2002.

Once the compensation program is operating‚ covered workers will have the option to accept the lump sum payment of $150,000 if they meet the injury criteria‚ or to proceed with litigation directly against beryllium vendors and other culpable parties‚ excluding government contractors and sub—contractors and the government itself‚ for which the statue establishes an exclusive remedy. A covered worker can not elect to collect the government payment and also proceed with litigation.

The compensation program was established by Congress in an attempt to provide uniform compensation to injuries claimed by covered workers employed at nuclear weapons sites of the DOE. The prior policy of the DOE was to litigate such claims. Congress was prompted into action because it found that “...a large number of nuclear weapons workers at sites of the Department of Energy and at sites of [beryllium] vendors...were put at risk without their knowledge and consent...” and “many previously secret records have documented unmonitored exposures to radiation and beryllium and continuing problems at these sites across the Nation.”

Brayton Purcell has been involved with beryllium related litigation since the late 1980s. Dedicated to representing individuals suffering from beryllium related injuries‚ we have represented both beryllium workers and individuals who have come into contact with beryllium through others. We seek damages in these cases to the full extent allowed by law in order to compensate our clients for their pain and suffering‚ loss of wages‚ and medical expenses. In our experience‚ verdict awards and settlements in chronic beryllium disease cases far exceed the $150,000 government payment and we believe that this arbitrarily selected compensation often is not enough to fully compensate the victims of the beryllium industry.

Brayton Purcell has successfully obtained a multimillion dollar jury verdict in a chronic beryllium disease case as well as negotiated settlements of over one million dollars each for other clients who suffer from chronic beryllium disease. Individuals who suffer from chronic beryllium disease should consider their long term future and the quality of life they can expect‚ before electing to accept the lump sum payment being offered by the Department of Energy. Though we can not guarantee the outcome of any case‚ at Brayton Purcell‚ we make every effort to obtain a fair resolution for our clients.

For the full text of The Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000‚ click here. (If you do not already have Adobe Acrobat Reader‚ you must download it from the Adobe web site to view these pages.)

  Printer friendly versionPrinter friendly version
   
Brayton <> Purcell, atorneys involved in litigation for beryllium workers and their families since the late 1980s.
Brayton <> Purcell, 222 Rush Landing Road, Novato, California 94945, (415) 898-1555
home | beryllium defined | exposure | medical | news | tools and resources | about us
  This web site is sponsored by the law firm of Brayton Purcell LLP for educational purposes. Please see our disclaimer.